Dismissed
Sushil Kumar v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/24296/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-24296 OF 2012 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 13.09.2012
Sushil Kumar
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. P. S. Jammu, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. P. S. Grewal, DAG, Punjab.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has been allowed the concession of bail by the trial Court and as such, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Sushil Kumar
State of Punjab
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court