The Single Judge made the earlier anticipatory bail order for the petitioner absolute, noting that he had joined the investigation and was not required for custodial interrogation.
The earlier order granting anticipatory bail was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-22828-2012(O&M)
Date of Decision: September 27, 2012
Santosh Chopra
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH
Present: Mr.SPS Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Gurnihal S. Grewal, AAG, Punjab.
NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL)
This is an application for anticipatory bail.
Learned State counsel has stated that pursuant to the order dated August 02, 2012 passed by this Court, the petitioner (Santosh Chopra) has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation.
In view of above, the aforesaid order is made absolute.
September 27, 2012 ( NAWAB SINGH ) `gian' JUDGE
Santosh Chopra
State of Punjab
Nawab Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
