Petitioners highlighted their acquittal and sought to withdraw the petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M-21077 of 2011 Date of Decision:18.1.2012
Pardeep Kumar and others
.... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Rattu, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Lathar, Advocate for respondent No.2.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the
petitioners have since been acquitted. Therefore, he may be allowed
to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
18.1.2012 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
Pardeep Kumar and others
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
