Disposed
Jai Parkash & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/20938/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-20938 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.8.2012
Jai Parkash and another
.....Petitioners.
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present : Mr. D.N.Ganeriwala, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kshitij Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL)
Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of the investigating agency, the petitioners have approached this Court, by way of instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., invoking its inherent jurisdiction seeking direction to the official respondents to submit report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., in FIR No. 746 dated 9.11.2010 under Sections 368, 506, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station City Sirsa.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, fairly states that during the pendency of this petition, report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been presented to the learned court of competent jurisdiction by the investigating agency rendering the present petition as infructuous.
Criminal Misc. No. M-20938 of 2011
2
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel
for the petitioners, the instant petition is ordered to be disposed of as
having been rendered infructuous.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE
28.8.2012 Ak Sharma
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Jai Parkash and another
State of Haryana and others
Rameshwar Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court