A petition where counsel submitted the matter was infructuous due to the default dismissal of the complained case was dismissed as such.
The petition was dismissed as rendered infructuous due to the default dismissal of the complaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.M-20771 of 2009 Date of Decision:15.5.2012
Hatinder Singh and others
.... Petitioners
Versus
Jaspreet Kaur
.... Respondent
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. ****
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the complaint in question stands
dismissed in default and the same may be dismissed as such.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
15.5.2012 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
Hatinder Singh and others
Jaspreet Kaur
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
