Petitioners withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition for inherent jurisdiction to enable re-agitation of points during trial. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn with liberty to re-agitate.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to re-agitate all points during trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-2069 of 2010 Date of Decision: January 10, 2012
Sarabhjit Kaur & another
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Raja Singh Grewal
.....RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
PRESENT: - Mr. N.S. Sodhi, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Vipul Dharmani, Advocate, for the respondent.
Mehinder Singh Sullar, J
(Mehinder Singh Sullar)
January 10, 2012 JUDGE
avin
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can exercise inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. given counsel's withdrawal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarabhjit Kaur & another
Raja Singh Grewal
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
