Allowed

Mamta Rani & Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Jul 2012CRM-M/19604/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for protection of life and liberty. The court issued a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, to take appropriate action on an application already made by the petitioner without examining the merits of the claim.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.2 to take appropriate action on application dated 6.7.2012 (Annexure P5).

Mamta Rani & Another Vs State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2012)

¶1

-1-

¶2

Crl.M.No.M-19604 of 2012(O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Crl.M.No.M-19604 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: July 6, 2012

¶5

Mamta Rani and another

¶6

.....Petitioners

¶7

¶8

The State of Punjab and others

¶9

......Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA

¶11

Present: Mr.Sandeep Thaken, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶12

.......

¶13

RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

Crl.M.No.37978 of 2012

¶15

Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶16

Crl.M.No.M-19604 of 2012

¶17

The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents nos.4 to 8.

¶18

Heard.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 6.7.2012, Annexure P5, already made to him by petitioner no.1.

¶20

As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Mamta Rani, as per copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate, Annexure P1, is 27.12.1989, and age

¶21

Crl.M.No.M-19604 of 2012(O&M) -2-

¶22

of petitioner No.2-Suresh Kumar, as per copy identity card issued by Election Commission of India, Annexure P2, is 18 years as on 1.1.2006. They got married on 5.7.2012, as per marriage certificate, Annexure P3. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P4.

¶23

In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 6.7.2012, Annexure P5, already stated to have been moved to him by petitioner no.1.

¶24

(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge

¶25

6.7.2012 meenu

Mamta Rani & Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mamta Rani & Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surender Singh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Ishwar Singh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Kewal Krishan Vs Union of India and Ors.

Saroop Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Gian Chand Vs State of Haryana and Ors.