In a Cr.P.C. 482 petition to set aside a Magistrate's order, the petitioner undertook service on respondents for July 9, 2012.
Petition allowed with direction to Additional Sessions Judge to decide pending revision within one month of service completion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-18898 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: July 3, 2012
Bharat Bhushan
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Haryana
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.R.S.Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner.
.......
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.36733 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-18898 of 2012
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for setting aside order dated 19.4.2012 passed by learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Fatehabad.
It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner undertakes to get the service effected upon unserved respondents
for 9.7.2012, the date already fixed before
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad.
Hence, the present petition is disposed of with direction to learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad, to make efforts to decide the pending revision petition on merit within one month from the date for which service is completed upon the respondents.
3.7.2012 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for setting aside the order dated 19.4.2012 be allowed on the undertaking to effect service on respondents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bharat Bhushan
State of Haryana
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
