Raj Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner counsel requested withdrawal of the petition. The court granted the withdrawal.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed as prayed for.
Petitioner counsel requested withdrawal of the petition. The court granted the withdrawal.
Petition allowed as prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M 178 of 2012 Date of decision: 09.01.2012
Raj Kumar
........ Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Ms Neha Jain, Advocate for Mr. R K Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that she may be allowed to withdraw the present petition.
Allowed as prayed for.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
mohan
09.01.2012
Raj Kumar
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court