Kamlesh Dhawan and Anr. v. State of Punjab Ana Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl. Misc. Petition disposed as infructuous as the underlying complaint was dismissed in the year 2005.
Crl. Misc. Petition disposed as infructuous as the underlying complaint was dismissed in the year 2005.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.M-17722 of 2008 Date of decision: 11.12.2012
Kamlesh Dhawan and another
... Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.Bedi
Present : Mr.Varinder Chhibbar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Ankur Jain, AAG, Punjab. Mr.Gurcharan Dass, Advocate
M.M.S.Bedi, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the complainant informs that the complaint
filed in the year 2005, has now been dismissed.
This petition is disposed of as having been rendered
infructuous.
( M.M.S.Bedi)
11.12.2012 Judge sd
Kamlesh Dhawan
State of Punjab
M.M.S.Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court