The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed for quashing an FIR as withdrawn by the petitioner, while granting liberty to raise all pleas at the appropriate stage during the trial.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take pleas during trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-17232 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: July 2, 2012
Harparkash Singh
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.H.S.Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.
....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.34343 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-17232 of 2012
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.60, dated 28.2.2012, under Sections 323, 452, 506, 447, 511, 380, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Tripri Town, Patiala, District Patiala.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to take all the pleas at appropriate stage during trial.
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
2.7.2012
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the FIR can be disposed of by allowing it subject to withdrawal with liberty to plead at trial stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harparkash Singh
State of Punjab
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
