Petitioner moved Criminal Miscellaneous Misc. No.M-16803 of 2012. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the petition as infructuous because bail had already been granted under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. The court made no substantive finding on the merits.
Petition dismissed as infructuous. No specific bail relief granted or modified.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-16803 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision:27.08.2012
Sukhchain Singh
... Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab ... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Present:Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. AG Punjab.
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK,J(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous as bail has been granted to the petitioner under the provisions of section 167(2) Cr.P.C.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
August 27,2012 ( VIJENDER SINGH MALIK ) Jiten JUDGE
Sukhchain Singh
State of Punjab
Vijender Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
