Petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to approach the statutory authority under Chapter XII of CrPC for a bail application.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to avail alternative remedy under Chapter XII CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.Misc.No.M-16332 of 2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.M-16332 of 2012(O&M)
Date of decision : 30.5.2012
Saina .......Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present : Mr. Salim Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J
Crl.Misc.No.32843 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to just exceptions.
Crl.Misc. Application stands disposed of.
Crl.Misc.No.M-16332 of 2012
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has got the
equally efficacious alternative remedy, which has not been availed by her, so far.
During the course of hearing, when confronted with the judgement of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and
others, (2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409, learned counsel for the petitioner very
fairly states that let this petition be ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty
Crl.Misc.No.M-16332 of 2012
2
to the petitioner to avail her alternative remedy, in terms of the law laid down in
Sakiri Vasu's case(supra).
In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and without prejudice to the rights of the parties, the instant petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
However, lest this order is misunderstood, it is made clear that as and when appropriate petition is moved by the petitioner before the concerned authority under Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the same shall be considered dispassionately and expeditiously, passing appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law.
With the observations made above, the instant petition is disposed of.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE
30.5.2012 GS
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and othersReferred¶20
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others, (2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409
Saina
State of Haryana and others
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
