The petitioner, arrested for snatching, sought bail. The High Court disposed of the bail application by allowing it, recording an annexure, and directing that bail be granted to the satisfaction of the trial court without commenting on merits.
Petitioner's bail application allowed; Bail to be granted by trial court to its satisfaction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-15807 OF 2012(O&M) DECIDED ON : 05.09.2012
Mandeep Kumar @ Honey
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. P. S. Grewal, DAG, Punjab.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
CRM NO. 52254-55 OF 2012
The application stands allowed and the document Annexure P-2 is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
MAIN CASE
As per allegations of the prosecution, petitioner along with Vinod Kumar snatched the purse of complainant containing `7000/- and voter card, forcibly. The petitioner is in custody since 01.04.2012. The complainant has appeared as witness but has not identified the petitioner.
So, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition stands allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of trial Court.
Disposed of.
SEPTEMBER 05, 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner subject to conditions?
Whether the petitioner can be released on bail pending trial given provisional identification issues?
Mandeep Kumar @ Honey
State of Punjab
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
