Rinka & Another v. State of Punjab & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a criminal under section 482 CrPC for direction to protect petitioners. The court disposed of the petition by directing Respondent No. 2 to look into grievance.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Respondent No. 2 to look into grievances of petitioners and take appropriate measures, if found necessary.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No. M 15306 of 2012 Date of decision: 22.05.2012
Rinka and another
........ Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate for the petitioners
-.-
- Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- To be referred to the Reporter or not?
- Whether the judgment should be reported in
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be given directions to protect their lives and liberty.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rinka
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
Nirmaljit Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/15306/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court