Petitioners no longer apprehending a threat from private respondents; petition rendered infructuous and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-15045 of 2012 Date of Decision: 19.09.2012
Amarinder Ubhi and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. A.S. Syan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not apprehending any threat at the instance of private respondents at this stage and are not in need of any protection.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, no further direction is required to be issued at this stage and hence, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as such.
However, in case of any grievance, the petitioners are at liberty
to move representation to the concerned police authority.
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
19.09.2012 gurpreet
Amarinder Ubhi
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
