Petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to seek action under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. The case was dismissed accordingly.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail of the remedy under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-14521 of 2012 Date of Decision: 16.05.2012
Malkiat Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present:Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
**
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be
allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail of the remedy
under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR) JUDGE
16.05.2012 gurpreet
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Malkiat Singh
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
