In Crl.M.No.M-13706 of 2012, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a petition for anticipatory bail that was withdrawn by the petitioner. The court granted leave for regular bail upon appearance.
Petitioner directed to appear before trial court and apply for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-13706 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: May 10, 2012
Bagu Khan
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Haryana and another
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Hamid Hussan, Advocate for the petitioner.
.......
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.27910 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-13706 of 2012
The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in complaint No.70, dated 17.1.2008, under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panchkula.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
However, petitioner is directed to appear before learned trial Court within two weeks from today and if he so appears and applies for regular bail, learned trial Court is directed to decide the same on merit within two days.
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
10.5.2012
meenu
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed as withdrawn.
Whether the petitioner is directed to approach the trial court for regular bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bagu Khan
State of Haryana
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
