Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The High Court disposed of the petition as infructuous because the petitioner had already been convicted by the trial court during its pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.M-No.13138 of 2012(O & M) Date of Decision:30.08.2012
Sukhchain Singh @ Chaina
.....petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.....respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present: Mr.Balbir Singh, Advocate for Mr.Ashok Singla, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms.Anmol Grewal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J.(ORAL):
The petitioner seeks bail pending trial, by way of instant petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in the case arising out of FIR No.60 dated 03.06.2010, under Sections 307, 341, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25/27 Arms Act, registered at Police Station Bhadaur, District Barnala.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that since during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner has been convicted by the learned trial Court, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is ordered to be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE
30.08.2012 neenu
Sukhchain Singh @ Chaina
State of Punjab
Rameshwar Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
