The petition was permitted to be withdrawn to allow the petitioner to file a fresh petition at the time of charge framing. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to take up pleas available at the time of framing of charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CRM-M No. 12977 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 1.11.2012
Mukesh Kumar @ Mona
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr.D.R.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.K.D.S.Sidhu, Addl.A.G.Punjab
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition to enable the petitioner to take up all the pleas available to him at the time of framing of charge.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SABINA) JUDGE
November 01, 2012
anita
Mukesh Kumar @ Mona
State of Punjab
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
