The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present petition. Permission was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-1188 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.7.2012
M/s D.D.Township Ltd.
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Present: Mr.Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner
Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Allowed to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
10.7.2012
gsv
(JITENDRA CHAUHAN) JUDGE
M/s D.D.Township Ltd.
State of Haryana
Jitendra Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
