Maman and Another v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
An order referencing a connected criminal Miscellaneous matter decided on the same date, deferring to that judgment for the operative order.
An order referencing a connected criminal Miscellaneous matter decided on the same date, deferring to that judgment for the operative order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 1164 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: January 25, 2012 .
Maman and another.
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Haryana.
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr. Anshumaan Dalal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. S.S.Pattar, Sr.DAG, Haryana.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
For orders, see Crl.Misc. No.M- 199 of 2012(Sheela and another
v. State of Haryana) of even date.
January 25, 2012. ‘om’
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sheela and another v. State of HaryanaReferred¶13
Crl.Misc. No.M- 199 of 2012(Sheela and another v. State of Haryana)
Maman and another
State of Haryana
RAM CHAND GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court