Petitioner sought relief after being acquitted of charges. The court held the petition infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. 11107 of 2012
DATE OF DECISION: 13.07.2012
Ashok Kumar
..........Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..........Respondents
BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. Vipul Dharmani, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. G.S. Brar, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has been acquitted of the charges framed against him, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
July 13, 2012 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE
Ashok Kumar
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
