Coram held that in view of an allowed Crl. Misc. application, the main petition was ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
Crl. Misc. application allowed; main petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-10195 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: July 06, 2012.
Deepak @ Madhu & another
... Petitioner(s)
v.
State of Haryana
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: Shri Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for Shri Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral):
Crl. Misc. No.37173 of 2012
Crl. Misc. application is allowed and the main petition is preponed to today.
Crl. Misc. No. M-10195 of 2012
In view of the prayer made in the aforesaid application, present
petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
July 06, 2012. kadyan
[ Paramjeet Singh ] Judge
Deepak @ Madhu & another
State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
