Single-judge order dismissing a criminal appeal where the appellant was convicted under Section 29 of the Arms Act, 1959 and sentenced to the term already undergone.
Appeal dismissed; Appellant sentenced to imprisonment for period already undergone; released if in custody unless required in another case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Appeal No.462-SB of 2000 Date of Decision: 17.07.2012
Sukhdev Singh
.....Appellants
Versus
The State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: - Mr. K.S. Sidhu, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. G.S. Benipal, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. K.S. Aulakh, AAG, Punjab.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J.
In this appeal, the appellant has been convicted for committing an offence under Section 29 of the Arms Act, 1959.
Appellant-accused is awarded sentence to imprisonment for the period already undergone.
If appellant-accused is in custody, he be released forthwith, if not required in any other case.
Disposed of.
For detailed reasons, see judgment of even date passed in Criminal Appeal No.180-SB of 2000 titled ' Sukhdev Singh and others vs. The State of Punjab'.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
July 17, 2012 R.S.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukhdev Singh
The State of Punjab
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
