One-judge civil revision held infructuous due to disposal of underlying suit. Petition dismissed without substantive adjudication.
None, petition disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.7629 of 2010 Date of decision : January 03, 2012
Ramnath
....Petitioner
versus
Vinod Kumar and others
....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal
Present : Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate, for the petitioner
None for the respondents
L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous, because suit, out of which this revision has arisen has since been finally disposed of.
In view of the aforesaid, the instant revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
( L.N. Mittal )
January 03, 2012 Judge 'dalbir'
Ramnath
Vinod Kumar and others
L.N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
