This revision petition was allowed without notice to set aside the impugned order, granting the petitioner three months to conclude evidence upon payment of Rs.5,000 as costs.
Petitioner granted three months to conclude evidence; impugned order set aside; Rs.5000 costs imposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.7518 of 2012
Date of decision: December 14, 2012
Rawal Ram
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Gram Panchayat of village Garhi Bharti
.. Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Ms. Deepa Jain, Advocate for Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
A.N. Jindal, J
The petitioner has sought to set aside the order dated 5.10.2012 (Annexure P/1) passed by the trial court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for grant of some more opportunity to conclude his entire evidence.
Having examined the impugned order and the contentions raised by the learned counsel, I deem it expedient in the interest of justice to grant some more opportunity to the petitioner to conclude his entire evidence. The delay, if any, caused in adjudication of the matter could be compensated with costs.
Resultantly, this petition is accepted, impugned order is set aside and the petitioner is granted three months to conclude his entire evidence subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as costs. The petitioner would be at liberty to procure the presence of the witnesses with the aid of the court.
This petition is allowed without serving notice to the respondent with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondent as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondent may move to this court for recalling this order.
(A.N. Jindal) Judge
December 14, 2012 deepak
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an additional opportunity should be granted to the petitioner to conclude his evidence.
Impugned order dated 5.10.2012 passed by trial court.
Delay in adjudication and grant of costs to compensate.
Rawal Ram
Gram Panchayat of village Garhi Bharti
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
