Petitioner sought civil revision. Court recorded that a compromise has been arrived at between parties. Petition treated as infructuous due to compromise.
Petition disposed as infructuous following compromise between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 6303 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.05.2012
Satish Kumar
... Petitioner
vs
Ritu Rani
..Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Diwan S. Adlakha, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikramjeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the respondent.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of compromise arrived at between the parties, the prayer made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
22.05.2012
sharmila
Satish Kumar
Ritu Rani
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
