Revision petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana was disposed of on withdrawal by the learned counsel for the petitioner in an oral order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-6281-2011 Date of decision:08.02.2012
Harbans Lal ...Petitioner Versus Manju and another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr. Sharan Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner. *****
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present revision petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn accordingly.
February 08, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE
Harbans Lal
Manju
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
