The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a revision petition as it was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner along with a miscellaneous application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Sr. No. 105
Case No. : C. R. No. 5990 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision : Oct. 21, 2013
Neera Bhatia
.... Petitioner
Vs.
B. K. Puri and others
.... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Ms. Anandita Katyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) :
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision petition along with miscellaneous application.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Oct. 21, 2013 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE
Monika 2013.10.21 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Neera Bhatia
B. K. Puri
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
