A revision petition against an interim order was disposed of on the ground that the underlying suit had been disposed of, rendering the revision infructuous. The judgment was not reported.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.5835 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: 18.10.2012
Piara Singh son of Harnam Singh son of Deva Singh, residnet of village Phalpota, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar and others.
... Petitioners
Versus
Dr. Jatinder Singh son of Late Avtar Singh son of Harnam Singh, resident of village Phalpota, Tehsil Phillaur district Jalandhar.
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present:Mr. SP Soi, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for the respondent.
K. KANNAN, J. (Oral)
The revision is against the interim order in a suit. The counsel for the respondent states that the suit has already been disposed of and the revision has become infructuous.
Revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
18th October, 2012 Rajan
( K. KANNAN ) JUDGE
Piara Singh and others
Dr. Jatinder Singh
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
