Civil Revision No. 5589 of 2010 was disposed of allowed as the petitioner moved to withdraw the petition due to it having become infructuous.
The petition was permitted to be withdrawn as it had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 5589 of 2010 (O&M)
Kanta Devi
.. Petitioner
versus
Gram Panchayat, Village Aklia and another
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. S. K. Dalia, Advocate for Mr. R. V. S. Chugh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Madan Sandhu, Advocate, for respondent no. 1.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition as the same has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
26.3.2012 ( Rajesh Bindal ) vs Judge
Kanta Devi
Gram Panchayat, Village Aklia
another
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
