Civil Revision No. 5420 of 2011 disposed upon termination of dispute via a compromise deed dated 07.12.2011 recorded by the court as rendering the petition infructuous.
No further relief necessary as the matter was compromised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 5420 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.05.2012
Gurdev Singh
... Petitioner
vs
Mangta and others
.... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Chetan Salathia, Advocate for Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Himanshu Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Compromise deed dated 07.12.2011 produced by learned counsel for the petitioner in Court today, is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter in dispute between the parties has been compromised, as a result of which, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
29.05.2012
sharmila
Gurdev Singh
Mangta and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
