Petitioner sought to challenge a bank's order. The court dismissed the present revision petition by relying on the detailed reasons recorded in a similar, previously decided revision (Rajinder Singh) involving the petitioner's father.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 2808 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.5.2012
Surinderpal Singh
.. Petitioner
v.
State Bank of Patiala
.. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Kuldip Sanwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that Civil Revision No. 2797 of 2012—Rajinder Singh v. State Bank of Patiala, impugning a similar order passed by the court below in a suit filed by the bank against father of the petitioner was dismissed by this court on 8.5.2012.
For the detailed reasons recorded in the aforesaid case, the present petition is dismissed.
24.5.2012 mk
( Rajesh Bindal ) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present revision petition should be decided on merits or dismissed by reference to the detailed reasons recorded in a related prior revision by the same court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajinder Singh v. State Bank of PatialaRelied on¶11
Rajinder Singh v. State Bank of Patiala, Civil Revision No. 2797 of 2012
Surinderpal Singh
State Bank of Patiala
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
