The High Court decided to treat the written appeal as settled by a judgment passed in FAO No.1988 of 2009 and ordered that the appeal be partly allowed.
Appeal partly allowed. Reasons incorporated from FAO No.1988 of 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R. No. 2373 of 2009 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R.No.2373 of 2009 ( O & M)
In MACT Case No. 53 of 2004/2006
National Insurance Co. Ltd
...Appellant
Versus
Kavita . ...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Present:Mr. Vivek Singal, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. A.K. Gahlawat, Advocate for respondent.
JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (ORAL)
For detailed reasons, mentioned in the judgment of even date, passed in FAO No.1988 of 2009 titled as National Insurance Company Vs. Kavita & others, which shall form part of this order, this appeal is partly allowed.
4.4.2012 aarti
( JITENDRA CHAUHAN) JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
National Insurance Company Vs. Kavita & othersRelied on¶13
FAO No.1988 of 2009
National Insurance Co. Ltd
Kavita
Jitendra Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
