The High Court disposed of the revision petition as infructuous because the underlying civil suit has been finally disposed of. The order requires no substantive analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 2340 of 2010 Date of Decision : 2nd February, 2012
Janeshwar Dass
.... Petitioner
Versus
Krishan & others
.... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. Arvind Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurmail Singh, Advocate for the respondents.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) :
Learned counsel for the parties state that the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous because the Civil Suit out of which this revision petition has arisen, has since been disposed of finally.
Accordingly the instant revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
2nd February, 2012 ( L. N. MITTAL ) 'raj' JUDGE
Janeshwar Dass
Krishan & others
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
