Petitioner sought permission to withdraw Civil Revision No. 1942 of 2012 with liberty to raise issues in appeal or final decree. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise issues in appeal or at final decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 1942 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.3.2012
Rakesh Sethi
.. Petitioner
v.
Subhash Sethi
.. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. H. S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the issues raised in the present petition at appropriate stage in appeal or at the time of passing of final decree wherever permissible in law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
28.3.2012 mk
Rakesh Sethi
Subhash Sethi
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
