The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a revision petition as infructuous because the underlying suit instituting the dispute had been withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Case No. : C. R. No. 1881 of 2011 Date of Decision : January 09, 2012
Jatinder Pal Singh .... Petitioner
Vs.
Bishan Singh Dhaliwal .... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. R. K. Mattoo, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurcharan Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) :
Counsel for the parties state that the suit instituted by plaintiffrespondent, out of which the instant revision petition has arisen, has since been dismissed as withdrawn and the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
January 09, 2012 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE
Jatinder Pal Singh
Bishan Singh Dhaliwal
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
