Dismissed
Vinod Bansal v. Karanvir Singh and Another
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/1422/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the petition to approach the Appellate Authority instead.
What the court decided
AI extract
Petitioner withdrew the petition to approach the Appellate Authority instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 1422 of 2012 (O & M) DATE OF DECISION: March 05, 2012
Vinod Bansal
.........PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
Karanvir Anand and another
......RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. G.S. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.
Counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this petition,
since he wants to approach the Appellate Authority for appropriate relief.
Dismissed as not pressed.
05.03.2012 reena
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
Vinod Bansal
Karanvir Anand
another
G.S. Sandhaulawa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court