In this default order, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a civil revision petition for lack of appearance by the petitioner despite repeated adjournment applications and absence of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 1269 of 1999 Date of decision:4th September, 2012
Gaurav Lal
........ Petitioner
versus
Ram Dass
........ Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN
Present: None.
K.Kannan, J.(Oral)
There is no representation for the petitioner. The case is being on board for number of days but there has been no representation. The petition is dismissed in default for non prosecution.
[K.KANNAN]
JUDGE
4th September, 2012
Shivani Kaushik
Gaurav Lal
Ram Dass
K Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
