Petitioner counsel stated the claim was rendered infructuous due to receipt of payment. The court dismissed the withdrawn company petition as prayed.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Company Petition No.06 of 2012 Date of Decision : July 18, 2012
M/s Gobind Enterprises versus
.....Petitioner
M/s Baba Gurmukh Singh Auto .....Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
Present : Mr.Rakesh Bhatia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since payment has been received, this petition has rendered infructuous.
As prayed for, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SURYA KANT) July 18, 2012 JUDGE Mohinder
M/s Gobind Enterprises
M/s Baba Gurmukh Singh Auto
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
