Spn College v. G. Vajralingam & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order referring practitioners to a related judgment for decisions regarding publication and digest reporting.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P.No.1090 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of Decision : May 30, 2012
SPN College versus
Dr.Roshan Sarkaria and another
.....Petitioner
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
Present : Mr.Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.G.S.Cheema, Senior DAG, Punjab.
-.-
- Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
- 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SPN College
- respondent
Dr. Roshan Sarkaria
Coram
Surya Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- COCP/1090/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court