The applicant and respondent reached a compromise wherein the applicant agreed to accompany the husband and the respondent undertook to withdraw his main petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The court disposed of the application as infructuous due to the settlement.
Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TA No. 486 of 2011 Date of decision: 19.10.2011
Madhu @ Sapna
..Applicant
Versus
Pancham Verma
..Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Present: Mr. Abhisheh Sethi, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr.Rajesh Arora, Advocate for respondent .
Parties present in person.
JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J.(ORAL)
Both the parties made a statement that they have compromised the matter with each other. The applicant is ready and willing to accompany respondent-husband even today from Court. The husband-respondent states that he undertakes to withdraw the main petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by him against the wife the applicant. Both the parties have gone together alongwith their minor child.
Disposed of as infructuous.
October 19, 2011
(JITENDRA CHAUHAN) JUDGE
Poonam (II)
3 issues framed by the court
Validity of the compromise that renders the pending application infructuous.
Fate of an application pending before the court after a settlement is reached by the parties.
Whether the wife's readiness to accompany the husband enables the court to dispose of the matter.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madhu @ Sapna
Pancham Verma
Jitendra Chauhan
Jitendra Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
