Plea has been taken that appellant-plaintiff had been continuing in possession of the land measuring 3 kanal 0 marla as per registered sale deed dated 11.5.1999 and as per jamabandi for the year 1992-93 and mutation Nos.1225 dated 8.6.1999 and 1303 dated 2.4.2003 were sanctioned in favour of appellant-plaintiff and pro forma respondentsdefendants on the basis of said sale deed. Further plea has been taken that the property was partitioned amongst the various co-owners and rapat roznamcha No.458 was entered in the revenue records on the basis of which mutation No.1269 dated 6.8.2011 was also sanctioned. He has challenged the said rapat roznamcha and the mutation by taking the plea that while selling the land in dispute, i.e., share of one of the co-owners, respondentdefendant Dharam Pal had also given him right to use rasta of 2 karams width for coming and going to road leading to Shyam Nagar and, however, in the partition proceedings, the said rasta was not provided to him, which was contested by respondents-defendants on the plea that the partition proceedings have become final. Appeal was filed by one of the co-owners, who had purchased the property from earlier co-owner Dharam Pal, before Collector and, however, the same was also dismissed.
