Dismissed
Norang v. Ajit Singh and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/3353/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 3353 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. 3353 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R. S. A. No. 3353 of 2008
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Case No. : R. S. A. No. 3353 of 2008
Date of Decision : March 11, 2011
Norang .... Appellant
Vs.
Ajit Singh and others .... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : None for the appellant.
Mr. Vivek Singla and Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocates for respondent no.1.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) :
Learned counsel for respondent no.1 has pointed out that Norang – original plaintiff-appellant filed suit to challenge consent decree suffered by him in favour of his three daughters (defendants no.1 to 3) and son of fourth daughter i.e. defendant no.4. It is submitted that Norang – appellant has since died and his four daughters i.e. defendants no.1 to 3 and mother of defendant no.4 have been impleaded as his legal representatives. They are also said to be his natural heirs. It is accordingly submitted that the instant second appeal has thus become infructuous.
R. S. A. No. 3353 of 2008
2
However, none is appearing for legal representatives of the
appellant today in spite of pass over, although last opportunity has been granted for today.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
March 11, 2011
monika
( L. N. MITTAL ) JUDGE
Norang
Ajit Singh and others
L. N. MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court