The High Court dismissed an appeal regarding the apportionment of a compensation amount of ₹12,880 paid to the Gram Panchayat, considering the small value involved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.320 of 1985 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.07.2011
Isher Dass and another
...Appellants
Versus
The Gram Panchayat, Kishenpura, and others
..Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Sandeep Goel, Advocate for respondent No.1.
RAJESH BINDAL, J.
A perusal of the paper-book shows that the issue involved in the present case is regarding apportionment of compensation of ` 12,880/-, which has been paid to the Gram Panchayat.
The contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellants is that the issue regarding title of the property is pending before the Revenue Authority and decision in the present appeal will affect the same. However, considering the fact that the involved amount in the appeal is small and the same has already been paid to the Gram Panchayat, which must have been spent for the common good in the village, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned award on account of smallness of amount. However, it is made clear that the same will not affect merits of the proceedings, if any, pending before the Revenue Authority regarding title of the property.
Dismissed.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
06.07.2011
sharmila
Isher Dass
The Gram Panchayat, Kishenpura
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
