Ut of Chandigarh v. Amru Chand
Case brief
What is this about?
Reference to a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 1287 of 2009 regarding similar proceedings. No substantive reasons or disposition recorded in this order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 1289 of 2009 (O&M)
(L.A.C. No. 57 of 2008)
Union Territory, Chandigarh
...Appellant
Versus
Amru Chand
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL.
Present: Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Senior Standing Counsel for Union Territory, Chandigarh.
None for the landowner.
RAJESH BINDAL , J
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union Territory, Chandigarh
- respondent
Amru Chand
Coram
RAJESH BINDAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/1289/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court