State of Haryana v. Smt. Kasturi
Case brief
What is this about?
This order refers the detailed reasoning to a separate order passed in R.F.A. No. 1249 of 1993. No substantive disposition or reasoning is recorded herein.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. NO. 1251 OF 1993 (O & M) (L.A.C. NO. 49 OF 1992)
State of Haryana
..............Appellant
Versus
Smt. Kasturi and another
...........Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present : Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
None for the landowners
RAJESH BINDAL, J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 1249 of 1993, titled as State of Haryana Versus Shamsher and others.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Haryana
- respondent
Smt. Kasturi and another
Coram
RAJESH BINDAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/1251/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court