Order refers the parties to a brother judge (Letter Patent Appeal No.826 of 2011) for the decision of the matter, noting the matter was adjourned previously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Letter Patent Appeal No. 851 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 18.05.2011
The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority ....Appellant
Vs.
Harbhajan Singh and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL
Present: Mr.H.S. Brar, Advocate, for the appellant.
HEMANT GUPTA, J.(ORAL)
For order, see Letter Patent Appeal No.826 of 2011 titled 'The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Vs. Narinder Kaur and others'.
(HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE
(A.N. JINDAL) JUDGE
18.05.2011 ajp
The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Harbhajan Singh and others
Hemant Gupta
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
