This Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed. The Single Judge had quashed an order of recovery of excess pension. The appellants sought interest on delayed benefit payment. The bench held that since excess recovery was deleted, claiming interest would not be equitable, dismissing the appeal as wholly without merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
LPA No. 735 of 2011
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
LPA No. 735 of 2011 Date of decision 2.8 .2011
Om Parkash and another
. Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana and another .. Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH
Present: Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellants
M.M.KUMAR, J.
(M.M.Kumar) Judge
2.8.2011
(Gurdev Singh) Judge
okg
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellants are entitled to interest on pension and retirement benefits after an order quashing recovery of excess payment.
Whether the appeal against the Single Judge's judgment warrants admission.
Om Parkash and another
State of Haryana and another
M.M. Kumar
Gurdev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
